Wednesday, December 23, 2020

COVID-19 VACCINE

 

                           Fig 1 above is obtained from the website @sciencemag.org

 

 ALLERGY

Severe allergy-like reactions in at least eight people who received the COVID-19 vaccine produced by Pfizer and BioNTech over the past 2 weeks may be due to a compound in the packaging of the messenger RNA (mRNA) that forms the vaccine’s main ingredient, scientists say. A similar mRNA vaccine developed by Moderna, which was authorized for emergency use in the United States on Friday, also contains the compound, polyethylene glycol (PEG).

PEG has never been used before in an approved vaccine, but it is found in many drugs that have occasionally triggered anaphylaxis—a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Some allergists and immunologists believe a small number of people previously exposed to PEG may have high levels of antibodies against PEG, putting them at risk of an anaphylactic reaction to the vaccine. 

"Until we know there is truly a PEG story, we need to be very careful in talking about that as a done deal,” says Alkis Togias, branch chief of allergy, asthma, and airway biology at U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

Pfizer, too, says it is “actively seeking follow-up.” A statement recommends that “appropriate medical treatment and supervision should always be readily available” in case a vaccinee develops anaphylaxis.

Anaphylactic reactions can occur with any vaccine, but are usually extremely rare—about one per 1 million doses. As of 19 December, the United States had seen six cases of anaphylaxis among 272,001 people who received the COVID-19 vaccine, according to a recent presentation by Thomas Clark of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); the United Kingdom has recorded two. Because the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines use a new platform, the reactions call for careful scrutiny, says Elizabeth Phillips, a drug hypersensitivity researcher at Vanderbilt University Medical Center who attended an NIAID meeting on 16 December. “This is new.” 

“Allergies in general are so common in the population that this could create a resistance against the vaccines in the population,” adds Janos Szebeni, an immunologist at Semmelweis University in Budapest, Hungary, who has long studied hypersensitivity reactions to PEG.

Scientists who believe PEG may be the culprit stress that vaccination should continue. “We need to get vaccinated,” Phillips says. “We need to try and curtail this pandemic.” But more data are urgently needed, she adds: “These next couple of weeks in the U.S. are going to be extremely important for defining what to do next.”

 

CLINICAL TRIAL

Pfizer’s and Moderna’s clinical trials of the vaccines, which involved tens of thousands of people, did not find serious adverse events caused by the vaccine. But both studies excluded people with a history of allergies to components of the COVID-19 vaccines; Pfizer also excluded those who previously had a severe adverse reaction from any vaccine. People with previous allergic reactions to food or drugs were not excluded, but may have been underrepresented.

The two vaccines both contain mRNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that help carry it to human cells but also act as an adjuvant, a vaccine ingredient that bolsters the immune response. The LNPs are “PEGylated”—chemically attached to PEG molecules that cover the outside of the particles and increase their stability and life span.

PEGs are also used in everyday products such as toothpaste and shampoo as thickeners, solvents, softeners, and moisture carriers, and they’ve been used as a laxative for decades. An increasing number of biopharmaceuticals include PEGylated compounds as well.

PEGs were long thought to be biologically inert, but a growing body of evidence suggests they are not. As much as 72% of people have at least some antibodies against PEGs, according to a 2016 study led by Samuel Lai, a pharmaco-engineer at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, presumably as a result of exposure to cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. About 7% have a level that may be high enough to predispose them to anaphylactic reactions, he found. Other studies have also found antibodies against PEG, but at lower levels.

Szebeni says the mechanism behind PEG-conjugated anaphylaxis is relatively unknown because it does not involve immunoglobulin E (IgE), the antibody type that causes classical allergic reactions. (That’s why he prefers to call them “anaphylactoid” reactions.) Instead, PEG triggers two other classes of antibodies, immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG), involved in a branch of the body’s innate immunity called the complement system, which Szebeni has spent decades studying in a pig model he developed.

In 1999, while working at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Szebeni described a new type of drug-induced reaction he dubbed complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA), a nonspecific immune response to nanoparticle-based medicines, often PEGylated, that are mistakenly recognized by the immune system as viruses.

Szebeni believes CARPA explains the severe anaphylactoid reactions some PEGylated drugs are occasionally known to cause, including cancer blockbuster Doxil. A team assembled by Bruce Sullenger, a surgeon at Duke University, experienced similar issues with an experimental anticoagulant containing PEGylated RNA. The team had to halt a phase III trial in 2014 after about 0.6% of 1600 people who received the drug had severe allergic responses and one participant died. “That stopped the trial,” Sullenger says. The team found that every participant with an anaphylaxis had high levels of anti-PEG IgG. But some with no adverse reaction had high levels as well, Sullenger adds. “So, it is not sufficient to just have these antibodies.”

At the NIAID meeting, several attendees stressed that PEGylated nanoparticles may cause problems through a mechanism other than CARPA. Just last month, Phillips and scientists at FDA and other institutions published a paper showing patients who suffered an anaphylactic reaction to PEGylated drugs did have IgE antibodies to PEG after all, suggesting those may be involved, rather than IgG and IgM.

Other scientists, meanwhile, are not convinced PEG is involved at all. “There is a lot of exaggeration when it comes to the risk of PEGs and CARPA,” says Moein Moghimi, a nanomedicine researcher at Newcastle University who suspects a more conventional mechanism is causing the reactions. “You are technically delivering an adjuvant at the injection site to excite the local immune system. It happens that some people get too much excitement, because they have a relatively high number of local immune cells.”

Others note the amount of PEG in the mRNA vaccines is orders of magnitude lower than in most PEGylated drugs. And whereas those drugs are often given intravenously, the two COVID-19 vaccines are injected into a muscle, which leads to a delayed exposure and a much lower level of PEG in the blood, where most anti-PEG antibodies are.

Nevertheless, the companies were aware of the risk. In a stock market prospectus filed on 6 December 2018, Moderna acknowledged the possibility of “reactions to the PEG from some lipids or PEG otherwise associated with the LNP.” And in a September paper, BioNTech researchers proposed an alternative to PEG for therapeutic mRNA delivery, noting: “The PEGylation of nanoparticles can also have substantial disadvantages concerning activity and safety.’”

Katalin Karikó, a senior vice president at BioNTech who co-invented the mRNA technology underlying both vaccines, says she discussed with Szebeni whether PEG in the vaccine could be an issue. (The two know each other well; both are Hungarian and in the 1980s, Karikó taught Szebeni how to make liposomes in her lab.) They agreed that given the low amount of lipid and the intramuscular administration, the risk was negligible.

Karikó emphasizes that based on what we know so far, the risk is still low. “All vaccines carry some risk. But the benefit of the vaccine outweighs the risk,” she says.

Szebeni agrees, but says he hopes that’s also true in the long run. He notes that both mRNA vaccines require two shots, and he worries anti-PEG antibodies triggered by the first shot could increase the risk of an allergic reaction to the second or to PEGylated drugs.

 

RISK 

To understand the risk, Phillips says, it’s crucial to unravel the mechanisms underlying the immune reactions and find out how often they are likely to occur. The known U.S. cases are currently under study, but key clues may have vanished: Anaphylactic reactions produce biomarkers that only remain in the blood for a few hours. At the NIAID meeting, participants discussed ways to ensure that blood samples from future cases are taken immediately and tested for those markers.

If PEG does turn out to be the culprit, the question is, what can be done? Screening millions of people for anti-PEG antibodies before they are vaccinated is not feasible. Instead, CDC guidelines recommend not giving the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines to anyone with a history of severe allergic reaction to any component of the vaccine. For people who have had a severe reaction to another vaccine or injectable medication, the risks and benefits of vaccination should be carefully weighed, CDC says. And people who might be at high risk of an anaphylactic reaction should stay at the vaccination site for 30 minutes after their shot so they can be treated if necessary.

“At least [anaphylaxis] is something that happens quickly,” Philips says. “So, it’s something that you can be very much alerted to, prepared to recognize early and be prepared to treat early.”

 

Information on this page is provided for interest only on a "best efforts" basis and does not 
constitute personal advice. Always discuss medical conditions and related matters with your doctor.

 

Reference: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, February 3, 2020

COVID-19 VERSUS SARS


 SIMILARITY

  • These are the similarities and differences between the latest health emergency and its predecessor, Sars, which affected more than 8,000 people in 37 countries

  • The two diseases are genetically similar and both have flu-like symptoms, but the new virus is clinically milder
 
Structure of Coronavirus




The two viruses share similar symptoms. Carriers of the latest coronavirus (covid-19) experience fever, malaise, dry cough, shortness of breath and occasionally respiratory distress, according to a number of medical journals. The virus carriers’ vital signs have been stable in most cases, but leukopenia, a decrease in white blood cells, and lymphopenia, a reduction in the white blood cells known as lymphocytes, were common, studies say.

Similarly, Sars also usually brings with it flu-like signs – including fever, chills, muscle aches, headache and occasionally diarrhoea. Both viruses are known to cause pneumonia.
The genetic sequence of the latest coronavirus is at least 70 per cent similar to Sars, according to medical journals. Both belong to the large coronavirus family which causes illnesses ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases.

Sars-infected cells inspected under a microscope during a news conference in Hong Kong in 2003 were found to be similar to the new coronavirus to the one that caused Sars, but they are not identical. 

 

TRANSMISSION

According to the WHO, both viruses are zoonotic – transmissible from animals to humans. Although the scientific research is ongoing, some studies suggest bats are the most likely hosts for the virus' origins, although it could not have been transmitted directly to humans.
Researchers have compared the new coronavirus’ genetic sequence with those in a library of viral sequences, and found that the most closely related viruses were that coronaviruses originated from the bats. The Chinese Centre for Disease Control (CDC) said it analysed samples of 15 animals from the seafood market thought to be at the centre of the outbreak, but found no match.

 

DIFFERENCES

The new virus (covid-19) is clinically milder than Sars in terms of severity, case fatality rate and transmissibility, according to medical data.So far, the mortality rate for the new virus is about 3.6 per cent – with 360 deaths out of the 10,000 people infected.

Meanwhile, the Sars outbreak infected 8,437 people worldwide with a mortality rate of 10 per cent. According to a WHO report, the deaths of 813 people were attributed to the Sars virus between November 1, 2002 and July 11, 2003.


CONTAGION

Nevertheless, the scale of the outbreak of the new coronavirus has already exceeded Sars, with the number of infected patients already outstripping the previous health emergency.
Another factor complicating prevention is the suggestion that the new coronavirus, unlike Sars, is transmissible even by people who are not showing any symptoms.

Information on this page is provided for interest only on a "best efforts" basis and does not 
constitute personal advice. Always discuss medical conditions and related matters with your doctor.

 
Ref:www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3048472





Wednesday, January 29, 2020

THE QUEST for ALZHEIMER APPLICABLE IN THE FUTURE


Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia remain devastating conditions to both patients and their families, yet Lovestone says he feels more optimistic today than ever before. 

Scientists have known for years that the brains of Alzheimer’s patients are filled with a protein called beta amyloid that accumulates in between neurons, which are the cells that send and receive signals from your brain.  Yet drugs that target the formation of beta amyloid have so far been unsuccessful at stopping or reversing the disease.

                     Beta amyloid protein plaques in the brain of an Alzheimer's patient


 Recently, though, Janssen has focused on a different approach aimed at tau, a protein that accumulates in thread-like “tangles” inside of neurons. 

“These tangles can spread from one neuron to the next, killing brain cells,” Lovestone explains. “The compound developed by Janssen is designed to potentially prevent the spread of tau.”  

 Janssen also recently began an early clinical trial of an anti-tau vaccine, which could be given to patients even in extremely early stages of the disease, before symptoms have begun.

“The progress that we’ve made in the past few years has been enormous,” he says. “We have a much better understanding about how Alzheimer’s develops, which genes and other risk factors are driving the disease, and how it progresses. While there is still much to do, we are preparing for a future in which Alzheimer’s is a treatable—and even preventable—disease.”



Information on this page is provided for interest only on a "best efforts" basis and does not 
constitute personal advice. Always discuss medical conditions and related matters with your doctor.



Ref: https://www.jnj.com/innovation/